I was contacted by another previously unknown cousin from the Janosky clan, who is also in PA and who found me through web browsing and the post I shared about the 4th of July on Sepia Saturday 30 posted here on July 2. http://patonlinenewtime.blogspot.com/2010/07/fourth-of-july-sepia-saturday-week-30.html My new found cousin, Karen is retired and lives in PA and was interested in the information I had about our great grandfather, Frank Ostrowski, etc. She knew next to naught about her father's side of the family because he and they were estranged from his clan.
Darn, we had just returned home from PA, but maybe next time we can connect in person. I was excited to have a contact to help me with some of the Janosky lineage and then, Karen sadly relayed with some embarrassment, that some of the relatives she did contact "do not want anything posted or shared on Ancestry," etc. Since they have provided nothing to me, ever and don't even know me, I don't quite fathom what they think will happen. I suspect this means they want to remain private and keep hiding themselves without contact from the likes of me. Well I am a resourceful researcher and can find things without them and I am not going to cease researching because unknown folks get their dithers in a tither! :) Karen and I agreed "well and oh ...and that's how weird the family can be." Her own father, who is my Mom, aunt, uncle's cousin and a son of Grand Aunt Mary (my Grandma Rose's sister) and Uncle Tom Janosky had limited to no interaction with his own family after marrying though he lived near by. Reportedly Great Aunt Mary did not like his wife. How often have I heard that tale in life? What strange people to allow such rifts to tear them apart from their families, such losses in their lives. I am beginning to think this is a latent curse of the Pollocks; these people are all part of the Ostrowski aka Ostroski clan.
Is there something genetic here, or is it just as I suspect people who are uninformed ignore or fear what they do not know and have little curiosity to reach beyond themselves and expand their worlds. The relative who protested married in and so is not part of the genetic heritage. I think it is just strangeness. Whatever.
But back to the reclusive relatives, I guess people who don't understand the Internet are frightened of it. They hear all these tales of identity theft, etc and so it goes. I do not have the kind of personal information that would cause hardships to these folks and though I was shrugging, I decided that I will not stop sharing on Sepia whatever I want to. The photos I have of family and my recollections and tales will go up despite their protests, they are my photos and my memories and history and I will publish them as I wish.
This does make me wonder though about family falling outs. I have a cousin, Sharon, who found me when we lived in CA, also on the Ostrowski side living in PA from whom I have heard not a word for almost two years now. Without reason she quit communicating though as far as I know she lives in Natrona Heights today still and her husband is on Facebook. we used to visit when we went to PA, dine with them, etc. Last year no Christmas card, nothing. I have tried to call Sharon and no answer on her phone and she does not return calls nor respond to email. I cannot imagine what would have set her off in a snit and I do hope nothing is wrong, but after making calls and sending cards and letters to no avail and no response, I get the hint! Who knows what turns peoples' heads. I find this strange behavior.
This trip to PA at Uncle's home I found some wonderful old books on his shelves and brought a few back home to MN. I know nothing about any of these books but could not resist them, printed in 1915, 1916, 1942 and 1943, with wonderful photos in the fronts, gorgeous inside covers with sketches and engraved covers which are heavily worn. They had them for a long time of that I am certain.
I have added to my library "Just David" by Eleanor H. Porter, 1916 published by Houghton Mifflin Co and offering a $25 prize to readers. Look at the gorgeous scene that was printed in green on the inside of the book which is partially obscured by this prize offering.
Then there is "Michael O'Halloran" by Gene Stratton-Porter and illustrations by Frances Rogers, Printed by Doubleday, Page & CO in 1915. The lovely color print inside has the caption "Just by the merest chance, could your name be Mickey? There is a name written inside, "W.C.Brust, October 11, 1915, Arnold, PA," who must have owned the book originally. And again notice the lovely green etchings along the opening pages. Oh these books must have been treasures in their day. I hope the pages hold together while I read them.
The "Prodigal Women" by Elizabeth Nowell Perkins was printed in 1942 and sports a cover with a note that it is a Book Club Edition. And finally "Hungry Hill" by Daphne du Maurier another Book Club edition printed in 1943. At least I am familiar with this author, but the cover is a gorgeous print of intriguing characters. I have many books on my shelf awaiting reading, so these four join that collection, but I am looking forward to the pleasure of delving into these old books. The Kindles and Nooks cannot provide the pleasure of a solid book in the hands. But then I think you have to really be a reader as I have been all my life to appreciate these!
I created this blog to record our RV trips and ;morphed into life in our retirement lane and telling my tales of life. Now my tales of life are on widowhood, my new and probably my last phase of l I have migrated to Facebook where I communicate daily, instantly with family/friends all over. I write here sometimes. COPYWRIGHT NOTICE: All photos, stories, writings on this blog are the property of myself, Patricia Morrison and may not be used, copied, without my permission most often freely given.
Other blog dominating
Blogger insists on showing my posts and comments to others as my Books Blog, You can click on it to get here and vice versa....the Book blog is just that while this one, my first, original has miscellany
Link to BookBlog https://patsbooksreadandreviewed.blogspot.com/
Wonderful post - and Sepia Saturday helps to reunite lost cousins : I like it. I suspect that the telephone directory is a far better source book for identity theft than Sepia Saturday.
ReplyDeleteOld books, like almost anything old, are fascinating. And it isn't necessary to be an avid reader to appreciate them. My first wife and I used to go to auctions and would buy boxes of books, pretty much sight unseen. It was so much fun going through those mysteries. Among many others, I once found 9 out of the 10 volumes of the Literary Digest, History of the World War. WW II had not been 'invented' yet. It covered every facet of the war including volumes of naval engagements, political events, the introduction of the tank as a battle weapon etc. Had many letters from, "doughboys" with descriptions of their adventures, hopes, fears and longings. I believe I passed those on to one of my sons who is a history buff, especially Civil War stuff.
ReplyDeleteTom
I just saw a news clip about old books at the Vatican with beautiful gold leafed drawings inside and they mentioned that old books have a scent that can help a collector distinguish knowckoffs. Yes, indeed, I can smell old books! To me it is a comforting scent! Takes me way back...
ReplyDeleteall seems too weird! At first blush I thought many people are terrified of the Internet", you know it'll steal your "self" and your secrets!!!LOL. But having further thoughts, I believe it is culture learned over many generations. Like stay secret, yet know one knows why. The only why is because that's the way it's always been done.
ReplyDeleteI'll call you a little later today to wish you " shh, it's secret!" Don't tell!LOL
Sandy
The art work on/in these books are really great. The subject and style is much richer than what you find in so many of todays publications. I'm sure the photography is great in some of the modern "coffee table" books, but the richness is lacking in comparison.
ReplyDeleteYour talents NEVER cease to amaze me!!!!
Sandy
I could have opened the duMaurier book cover completely and shown the rest of it but didn't think too....Nothing like this
ReplyDelete